TAKFARINAS blogs

Hi everybody!

My best wishes for u all for a happy, healthy and peaceful new year 2010.

A discussion skids:  
- When we speak all at the same time.  
- When we answer without listening to the question.  
- When our interlocutor is not respected.  
- When we discuss of all and nothing.  
- When we don't define a subject of discussion or we define it badly
- When it is a discussion between ego and not between brains

- When we are not accustomed to discuss.  

and at the end a quotation of Voltaire who summarizes all " When a question raises opinions violently contradictory, we can ensure that it belongs to the field of the belief and not to that of knowledge."

There are two ways of thinking about policy that can be qualified as "top-down" Vs "bottom-up" the "Top" is the ideology and the "Down" is reality.

In the first case, we try to bring reality into a mold of pre-established beliefs (ideal). In the second, we try to rationalize that fact by giving it a sense a posteriori (Realists).

When you look at the "idealist" proposals in many countries, we can find two types: those inspired by historical and geographical inspiration.

1) The first want to change reality so that it looks like a history. They are nostalgic, while expressing genuine and rooted in history, they ignore large parts of it.

2) The latter want our reality resembles that of others. Well intentioned, they forget that if other countries have managed to find a system that suits them perfectly because they have built themselves. Try to imitate a system whatsoever comes to recognize an intrinsic superiority. Assuming that such a system exists (I doubt), it is primarily its adaptability is important.

With a beautiful shoe the wrong size, we continue to walk barefoot.