Learn English with English, baby!

Join for FREE!

Social_nav_masthead_logged_in

English Forums

Use our English forums to learn English. The message boards are great for English questions and English answers. The more you contribute, the more all members can practice English!

:  

Life Talk!

NATO airstrike kills 33 civilians in central Afghanistan

~MemoTheHun~

Germany

  NATO airstrike kills 33 civilians in central Afghanistan A NATO airstrike killed at least 33 civilians in central Afghanistan, the Cabinet said Monday, the third time a mistaken coalition strike has killed noncombatants since the start of a major offensive aimed at winning over the population. The top NATO commander, US Gen. Stanley McChrystal, apologized to the Afghan president, NATO said.

The Afghanistan Council of Ministers strongly condemned the airstrike Sunday in Uruzgan province, calling it ”unjustifiable.” Initial reports indicated that NATO planes fired at a convoy of three vehicles, killing at least 33 people, including four women and a child, and injuring 12 others, it said in a statement.

It urged NATO to “closely coordinate and exercise maximum care before conducting any military operation” to avoid further civilian casualties.

NATO confirmed that its planes fired on what it believed was a group of insurgents on their way to attack a joint NATO-Afghan patrol, but later discovered that women and children were hurt. The injured were transported to medical facilities, it said in a statement.

The Afghan government and NATO have launched an investigation.

Interior Ministry spokesman Zemeri Bashary earlier said the airstrike hit three minibuses traveling on a major road near Uruzgan’s border with central Day Kundi province. There were 42 people in the vehicles, all civilians, he said.

 

Bashary said Afghan investigators had collected 21 bodies and two people were missing. He said he was checking with Cabinet officials to find out how they had determined that at least 33 had died.  The NATO statement did not say how many people died or whether all the occupants of the vehicles were civilians.

“We are extremely saddened by the tragic loss of innocent lives,” Gen. McChrystal said in the statement. “I have made it clear to our forces that we are here to protect the Afghan people and inadvertently killing or injuring civilians undermines their trust and confidence in our mission. We will redouble our effort to regain that trust.”

On Saturday, Afghan President Hamid Karzai admonished NATO troops for not doing enough to protect civilian lives. During a speech at the opening session of the Afghan parliament, Karzai called for extra caution on the part of NATO, which is currently conducting a massive offensive on the southern Taliban stronghold of Marjah in neighboring Helmand province.

“We need to reach the point where there are no civilian casualties,” Karzai said. “Our effort and our criticism will continue until we reach that goal.”  NATO has gone to great lengths in recent months to reduce civilian casualties - primarily through reducing airstrikes and tightening rules of engagement - as part of a new strategy to focus on protecting the Afghan people to win their loyalty over from the Taliban.

But mistakes have continued. In the ongoing offensive against Marjah, two NATO rockets killed 12 people in one home and others have been caught in the crossfire. At least 16 civilians have been killed so far during the offensive, NATO says, though human rights groups say the number is at least 19.

On Thursday, an airstrike in northern Kunduz province missed targeted insurgents and killed seven policemen.

Afghans chant anti-American slogans during a protest in Jalalabad, east of Kabul, on Thursday. Nato airstrikes killed 33 Afghan civilians on Monday

It was public outrage in Afghanistan over civilian deaths that prompted McChrystal to tighten the rules last year.

A total of 2,412 Afghan civilians were killed last year, the highest number in any year of the eight-year war, according to a U.N. report. But deaths attributed to NATO troops dropped nearly 30 percent as a result of the new rules, it said.

This is the largest joint NATO-Afghan operation since a US-led invasion ousted the Taliban government from power in 2001. It’s also the first major ground operation since President Barack Obama ordered 30,000 reinforcements to Afghanistan.

Gen. David Petraeus, who oversees the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, said on NBC’s “Meet The Press” that Marjah was the opening salvo in a campaign to turn back the Taliban that could last 12 to 18 months.

But the continued toll of civilian lives will make it harder for NATO in its goal to win over the support of local Afghans against Taliban militants in the south.

The newly appointed civilian chief for Marjah was to arrive later on Monday to begin the task of restoring government authority after years of Taliban rule even though NATO troops are still battling insurgents in the area.

District leader Abdul Zahir Aryan will be flying into Marjah for the first time since the NATO offensive began Feb. 13.

 

03:47 PM Feb 23 2010 |

The iTEP® test

  • Schedule an iTEP® test and take the official English Practice Test.

    Take Now >

spontan

spontan

Germany

memo the hun

 i fear the us military strategy will cause  much more killed civilian in the next 18 month, they have also a military name for killing civilians …they call this kind of civilians killing perfidious "collateral damage".

United States Department of Defense definition collateral damage — Unintentional or incidental injury or damage to persons or objects that would not be lawful military targets in the circumstances ruling at the time. Such damage is not unlawful so long as it is not excessive in light of the overall military advantage anticipated from the attack. (Joint Publication 3-60)

""The head of US Central Command, Gen David Petraeus, said on Sunday the operation, part of a revised strategy for combating insurgents, would probably last up to 18 months."" http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8528715.stm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collateral_damage

04:53 PM Feb 23 2010 |

MarcoArmaniBRA

Brazil

NATO BITCHES CAN'T SHOOT WELL. THEY SHOOT INNOCENT PEOPLE, THEN THEY GIVE RIGHTS FOR MUSLIMS TO GENERALIZE THE WHOLE WEST, INCLUDING POOR HAITIANS. SAD, BUT CLASSICAL.

07:28 PM Feb 23 2010 |

fabs1

fabs1

United Kingdom

an absolute tragedy. may gd comfort and meet them all.

08:12 PM Feb 23 2010 |

SantiagoC

SantiagoC

Uruguay

hate nato

11:36 PM Feb 23 2010 |

fabs1

fabs1

United Kingdom

@santiago:

 

You're a fool. 

NATO is one of the reasons why the world is free today.

03:08 AM Feb 24 2010 |

SantiagoC

SantiagoC

Uruguay

How can peace be made with war?

Freedom for who? 

04:35 AM Feb 24 2010 |

fabs1

fabs1

United Kingdom

Freedom against communism and the Soviet Union.

04:44 AM Feb 24 2010 |

SantiagoC

SantiagoC

Uruguay

Is this the kind of freedom that the NATO supported?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism 

04:57 AM Feb 24 2010 |

MarcoArmaniBRA

Brazil

You're a fool.

fool and shitty commie, believe me.

 

The only way, is to leave Afganistane, because they can only bring pain and disaster t othis poeple 

blablabla, at least now they can go to the movies and watch TV without being beheaded by your TALEBAN husbands.

11:32 AM Feb 24 2010 |