Ruins uncovered of the Second Jewish Temple

No, they didn’t. Otherwise there would logically be no ruins or artefacts predating the Roman period. There are THOUSANDS.
You take it so literally that the Romans ‘cleaned the land’ and therefore use it as an excuse to deny all contrary evidence.
What are you talking about? The stones have been dated by reliable researchers.
I think you’re the only person ‘dreaming’. The proof is there. The hundreds of ritual baths uncovered, which I’ve seen and anyone else that goes there can see, stand testament to what was once there. And there is even more evidence sitting right beneath the Temple Mount, which the Muslim waqf doesn’t want archealogists to uncover.
It’s clear to any researcher that the Temple was there.

The existence is more than proven.
The stones have been dated.
If you ever went there, you would see the massive excavations in the area. The Temple steps have been uncovered, and so have dozens of ritual baths been found. its clear what the area is.